Google’s Chrome browser seems to have grabbed a lot of media attention since its release. With people reviewing the performance and security aspects of the brwoser to some predicting the end of the IE monopoly and the eventual demise of Firefox. But of all the Hoo-Haa, the one thing thats being most talked about lately is Google’s EULA for Chrome. All of the technical aspects (read bugs/shortcomings) of the browser can be dispensed saying that this is just the Beta and Google would eventually rectify all of them. However, how does one sideline the License. Lets take a closer look.
Now I must admit, I totally ignored the EULA when I installed Chrome [was very excited and just wanted to get started]. I just went “Next, Click… Next, Click.. Install… Yippee!!!“. But little did I realise that there were some clauses that would really kick up a storm.
“By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services.”
Or as someone put it
“Your Privacy Goes Up in Smoke”
If you are interested in reading through Chrome’s entire privacy policy, please Click Here
A few question that come up are
– If I send an email from within Chrome, is that now Google’s Properly.
– If I create documents or upload photos using Google’s own services, am I sharing the copyright?
Well I am certainly no legal eagle, but on the face of it, it does look and sound very Ominous. [Buhahaaha....]
I understand that the motivation behind Chrome was to enhance the surfers experience and bring the browser more up to date with today’s internet applications. But in the process Google seems to be creating a silent monopoly with all roads [read address bars] leading to Google’s flagship product, its search engine.
Please note that I am very big fan of the Google search engine and many of its services/products. However, I do feel the need not to speak up on what I feel isn’t right no matter how sour it may taste.
Now if you don’t like the EULA, you can just download the code from the Chromium project [the open-source project behind Google Chrome], build the application and start using the browser. Click here if you are interested.
So I guess its finally down to us users to decide between Chrome and Chromium.
P.S: For quick access please find below the links to the respective pages.
1. Google Chrome’s Privacy Policy
2. The Chromium Project
Google has updated his EULA it seems because I can’t find the text you are refering to. I even found this :
“Google acknowledges and agrees that it obtains no right, title or interest from you (or your licensors) under these Terms in or to any Content that you submit, post, transmit or display on, or through, the Services, including any intellectual property rights which subsist in that … ”
Thanks,
Alex
By: Alex on September 4, 2008
at 6:49 pm
Wow… I never knew that there was a hidden agenda in the EULA. Next time I better read up. I hope Google doesn’t do anything stupid, its such a promising browser…
By: megadranix on September 5, 2008
at 9:28 am
It’s just like IE6. Before Firefox forced (by creating demand) Microsoft to put multiple tabs at the top of the screen running under the same process, IE6 had each tab (actually window) at the bottom of the screen (on the taskbar) running under its own process. Google just moved the taskbar to the top of the screen, which you could do with Windows 10 years ago. There was never any difference between tabs and Windows except how they ran in one process or more than one. Google just went back to IE6, but using Mozilla’s code because it’s free to steal.
By: bkm on September 5, 2008
at 3:48 pm
They changed the EULA. Google the term “Chrome EULA” and you’ll find the latest scenario
By: drabir on September 5, 2008
at 6:30 pm
Well on the one hand you have Google with their EULA, and Chromium with no EULA.
Also it’s not clear if Chromium sends data to Google just like Chrome does. I think it does, though.
By: chrome on October 4, 2008
at 5:40 am
First of all, Google Chrome Beta (yes, it’s still in beta) which was released not long ago should not be compared with any browser because it has been released for a short while and this is there first browser and it’s just a Beta (not the completed version) unlike Firefox, and yet it still manages to challenge Firefox. Wait until Google releases 1-3 more updates/upgrades/newer versions to Google chrome and then try it again and most of you would like it (or since i’m now posting this, try the latest version of Google Chrome) but if you want add-ons/extensions that don’t slow down your browser or cause other issues like with Firefox, give Google 5 months – 1 year. Also, Google Chrome, believe it or not, is much faster, has a cleaner interface, uses less memory, crashes less than Firefox (with me) and is more secure and Google releases 10-30 nightly builds of Google Chrome everyday and also has a Developers/Testers channel which has newer versions of Google Chrome every 1-2 weeks (with a change log and new features etc) which are tested before they are publicly released. Google Chrome’s EULA was changed the day it was released when an error was found in it.
By: ADMIN on October 26, 2008
at 8:26 pm
scroogle.org
screw google
By: kmonk on August 31, 2009
at 12:55 am
[...] Chrome Vs. Chromium – Review Continued « From Dreamer to Doer a few seconds ago from web in context [...]
By: aciid's status on Saturday, 17-Oct-09 16:26:52 UTC - Identi.ca on October 17, 2009
at 4:27 pm